Hotel Room Damage Leads to Guest Liability Dispute


A guest at a hotel in Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongnam, faces a heated dispute after being accused of causing severe damage to the hotel room floor due to improper use of the room's boiler. Despite following the hotel's guidance, the guest finds themselves in a conflict with the hotel owner over a claim for damages amounting to 650,000 KRW. This incident raises questions about guest responsibilities, hotel management's duty of care, and the proper functioning of hotel facilities.

Timestamped Highlights

πŸ”₯ The video opens with a shocking scene of a hotel room floor severely damaged, resembling a fire incident. The guest narrates their stay at the hotel, booked via an app, and the unexpected aftermath.
πŸ“ž After a seemingly normal stay and checkout, the guest receives a call from the hotel owner accusing them of burning the floor and demanding compensation.
πŸ›οΈ The guest explains that they slept on the first floor on a mattress due to the discomfort of the low-ceiling second floor, contrary to the owner's instructions to sleep on the second floor.
πŸ’Ό The hotel owner insists that the guest pay half the renovation cost, amounting to 150,000 KRW, claiming the damages resulted from not following the boiler settings instructions.
πŸ“± The dispute escalates as the hotel owner uses the booking app to formally request 650,000 KRW in damages, with the app's support seemingly siding with the hotel.
βš–οΈ A legal expert weighs in, suggesting that the hotel owner bears primary responsibility for the incident due to poor management or faulty boiler installation.
πŸ” Speculation arises that this may not be the first such incident at the hotel, prompting discussions around safety and potential risks of improperly installed boilers.

Key Insights

Exploring the delicate balance of guest liability versus hotel responsibility, this incident shines a light on the complexities of consumer rights in the hospitality industry.
The escalation of the dispute to a 650,000 KRW claim reveals the potential for minor incidents to lead to significant financial and reputational consequences for both parties.
The role of booking apps in mediating such conflicts is brought to the fore, highlighting the need for clear policies and support systems to protect both consumers and service providers.
This case underscores the importance of proper maintenance and clear communication of safety guidelines in hotels to prevent such occurrences.
The financial implications for the guest, and the hotel's aggressive approach to seeking compensation, raise questions about the fairness and ethics of damage claims.
πŸ› οΈ
The possibility of recurring incidents suggests systemic issues with the hotel's facilities, potentially indicating neglect or a lack of regular safety checks.
Finally, the incident emphasizes the need for guests to be vigilant about their rights and for hotels to ensure their facilities are up to standards to avoid legal disputes.


Who is liable for hotel room damages?

In this case, the dispute centers on whether the guest or hotel management is responsible for the damages.

How much is the hotel owner claiming in damages?

The hotel owner initially demands 150,000 KRW but later escalates the claim to 650,000 KRW through the booking app.

Did the guest follow the hotel's boiler instructions?

The guest asserts they followed the instructions, but the owner claims the damages were due to incorrect boiler use.

What does the legal expert say about the liability issue?

The legal expert suggests the hotel owner should bear the responsibility for poor management or installation.

Could this incident have been prevented?

The incident raises concerns about the hotel's duty of care and the necessity for proper safety measures and instructions.
This blog is a summary of a YouTube video "[μžλ§‰λ‰΄μŠ€] "μ±…μž„μ ΈλΌ" λΆ„λ…Έν•œ 사μž₯λ‹˜β€¦ν‡΄μ‹€ λ’€ λ‚ μ•„μ˜¨ '폭탄' μ²­κ΅¬μ„œ / JTBC News - YouTube" by JTBC News